This example is from the technology side, not the association side, but I think it illustrates the point beautifully.
Lijit is a search and stats tool that allows you to put up a little widget on your blog (see mine over there on the right) so your readers can search not only your blog, but also your social networks and other social spaces, and your friends' sites too, for specific content.
Chris Brogan posted a message on twitter asking why his Lijit widget was suddenly showing ads. I remember this, because I went and had a look at mine at the time but didn't see anything.
Anyway Lijit posted this summary on their blog, where they laid out what the query was, what their response was, and how they discovered the root of the issue (which was not what Chris thought, but was a potential source of confusion). I won't repeat the specifics here, but they laid out the issues clearly, figured out where there might have been a lack of clarity in their communications about how the application was supposed to work, then explained how they were going to go about fixing the problem. They then stated that they were always in a 'state of learning" and thanked Chris for bringing this to their attention.
The result? A happy Chris:
" 1. Chris Brogan... Says:
July 22nd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
The best part of Lijit (beyond your interesting technology) is that you stepped up, listened, responded, and gave us insight into what comes next. I wasn’t upset about the ads. I didn’t like the functionality of doubling up the real estate on my page. Once I understand what it was, how it worked, etc, I calmed down, and with all your conversations, I felt even more educated.
Thanks for your attention and for your follow-through."
What stands out for me here, beyond the clear description of the step-by-step process from compaint to resolution, is that the response by Lijit was personal, open and honest in tone. There was not one hint of a "company line". While we don't all need to be as personal as this stylistically, in the way we write when we are representing our associations, there is a lesson here, in that our audiences absolutely expect us to have a face and a voice. Stock answers, avoidance of a direct acknowledgment of the issues, any kind of brush-off, can now have hugely detrimental consequences.
I would say this is a really good example of how it should be done.
Nicely handled, Lijit!!
7.28.2008
Here's a great example of how to listen and how to have a real conversation
Labels: blogging, conversation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
Maddie, thanks for the kind words. One of the things I really like about Lijit is we dont even have a company line to toe. We are just a bunch of folks that are working on a product/service that we all believe in, and use daily.
Love the pink Lijit! Hope its all going well... ;)
The outstanding question concerning the Lijit Widget for Publishers is: of the revenue stream, what % is available for the actual Publisher?. Along with the ability to search data is the VALUE of this data. Who owns it? What about each individual blogger’s data and the critical sanctity of Publishers private statistics. We at P.U.B. consider the safety of the information any app or widget(s) may be gathering, unbeknownst to the unwitting Publisher who installs them.
P.U.B. [Publishers Union of Bloggers] has pending inquires to Widget Providers concerning how they generate their income and what percentage of this income goes to the Blog Publisher making the critical decision to allow a Widget on their site for their readers. In addition we are requesting transparency on the critical issue of how the private statistic from Publishers Blogs are being used, hopefully with the Publisher’s permission!
P.U.B. expected to hear back from Lijit on these financial and private statistics issues from P.U.B’s inquiry we sent to Lijit in mid April 2008. So far all we’ve read is a public blog response from a Lijit employee advising Lijit has no money, and more recently, we received an email from Lijit’s CEO, Todd Vernon, attacking P.U.B. and falsely accusing we are writing fictitious emails. Any actual answers to our questions about the use of Publisher’s stats, or revenue as it applies to Lijit? Nada. Nothing. P.U.B.’s job is to fight for Publishers by asking the hard questions and demanding answers. If all Widget companies respond as Lijit’s done up to this point, P.U.B. has a big workload for our Publishers, and your membership and support helps us all as Publishers, thanks.
If P.U.B. gets a straight answer on topic from Lijit, not smoke and mirrors, we will let great Blog Publishers like you know their exact revenue/statistics use/sharing deal. Currently we are also working with Blog Publishers to track performance hit evaluations of Widgets, and the actual ownership of content pulled by widgets from our blogs.
Will publish these results to keep the community of Blog Publishers informed on this critical component of Widgets on our Blogs.
Sincerely,
Barney Moran
Founder, P.U.B.
Post a Comment